<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: q-analogues and homogeneous spaces</title>
	<atom:link href="http://concretenonsense.wordpress.com/2009/04/28/q-analogues-and-homogeneous-spaces/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://concretenonsense.wordpress.com/2009/04/28/q-analogues-and-homogeneous-spaces/</link>
	<description>A group blog about mathematics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:53:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven Sam</title>
		<link>http://concretenonsense.wordpress.com/2009/04/28/q-analogues-and-homogeneous-spaces/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 02:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://concretenonsense.wordpress.com/?p=452#comment-202</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think we have to assume anything other than what I said. I have it written up here:
http://math.mit.edu/~ssam/writings/calderochapoton.pdf (Lemma 2.2)

I&#039;m not very familiar with the Weil conjectures, but I think the technique used to prove this theorem is utilized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think we have to assume anything other than what I said. I have it written up here:<br />
<a href="http://math.mit.edu/~ssam/writings/calderochapoton.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://math.mit.edu/~ssam/writings/calderochapoton.pdf</a> (Lemma 2.2)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not very familiar with the Weil conjectures, but I think the technique used to prove this theorem is utilized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zygmund</title>
		<link>http://concretenonsense.wordpress.com/2009/04/28/q-analogues-and-homogeneous-spaces/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Zygmund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 00:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://concretenonsense.wordpress.com/?p=452#comment-201</guid>
		<description>&quot;Theorem. Let X be a variety defined over Z and assume for some prime p, and all r&gt;0, that the function  is obtained by plugging in  into some polynomial P(t). Then P(t) has integral coefficients, and P(1) is the Euler characteristic of  (computed using cohomology with compact support).&quot;

Under what conditions is this true?  It seems like an interesting theorem.  (Is this related to the Weil conjectures?  I remeber something like this was true for elliptic curves.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Theorem. Let X be a variety defined over Z and assume for some prime p, and all r&gt;0, that the function  is obtained by plugging in  into some polynomial P(t). Then P(t) has integral coefficients, and P(1) is the Euler characteristic of  (computed using cohomology with compact support).&#8221;</p>
<p>Under what conditions is this true?  It seems like an interesting theorem.  (Is this related to the Weil conjectures?  I remeber something like this was true for elliptic curves.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
